Aggiornamento sul progetto Glasswing di Anthropic
Sintesi redazionale: Ad aprile, Anthropic ha lanciato il Progetto Glasswing. L'idea era quella di consentire alle aziende di utilizzare il loro nuovo modello per individuare e correggere le vulnerabilità nei propri software.. Fonte originale: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/06/anthropics-project-glasswing-update.html
<p>## Anthropic’s Project Glasswing Update</p><p>In April, Anthropic initated Project Glasswing. The idea was to let companies use their new model to find and fix vulnerabilities in their own software. It was a fantastic PR move, and so many press outlets have uncritically parroted Anthropic’s claims that it’s now common wisdom that Mythos is better at finding software vulnerabilities than other models. Which is just not true.</p><p>In any case, Anthropic has published a Project Glasswing status report. It’s finding a lot of vulnerabilities in software—yay! Some of them are even dangerous. But almost none of them has been patched. It’s weird. There’s something fishy about the data that I don’t understand. That Anthropic refuses to release details—that it just says “trust us”—is a big problem here.</p><p>KC • June 8, 2026 9:07 AM</p><p>Davi, on his blog, appears to question why a “patch isn’t generated and attached to the disclosure in the first place… It looks like pressure to pay for protection.”</p><p>However, unlike Opus 4.7, I don’t think Mythos has patching functionality?</p><p>To add, in the context of open-source software, are there risks to “fast patching“?</p>